Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1393

reference
623-tree-1
name
1393
tree-preservation-order

undefined

623-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023210 50.880989)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023167 50.880984,-1.023169 50.880993,-1.023175 50.881000,-1.023184 50.881006,-1.023196 50.881010,-1.023209 50.881012,-1.023234 50.881007,-1.023244 50.881001,-1.023250 50.880993,-1.023252 50.880985,-1.023250 50.880977,-1.023244 50.880969,-1.023235 50.880963,-1.023223 50.880959,-1.023210 50.880958,-1.023197 50.880959,-1.023185 50.880963,-1.023175 50.880969,-1.023169 50.880976,-1.023167 50.880984)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL